AshleyDay44
20 Watchers232 Deviations
4.4K
Pageviews Journals2
Newest
This is the analysis of Dave Skye's supposed glyphs of an unknown, secret, or lost language. The claims are that these are written from his mind, and that they must mean something because this "gift" showed up suddenly. The request was made to figure out what these glyphs mean, and as a feature of a channel I follow on youtube, I came to this video (link at the bottom), and decided to explain what it is, due to the amount of illogical assumptions made.
Though it does seem a bit ridiculous to analyze these "glyphs", it is the only proper way to determine factual evidence, and claim it as such. Mere thoughts and opinions have little purpose when it comes to determining knowledge above the level of hypothetical chit chat.
In other words, it has no value, no factual support without an actual analysis, and so I present my findings with facts and logical reason.
The photo's and compilation of the material will be at the bottom in full, and with thumbnails when relevant.
***TO SKIP ANALYTICAL SPECIFICS, MOVE AHEAD TO "DETAILS" & "SUMMARY"***
***TO SKIP EXAMPLES, MOVE FURTHER DOWN TO "CONCLUSION"***
From left going down 1-5, then right going down 6-10 (amount of photos)
(Amount of glyphs per photo)- 1. 23, 2. 34, 3. 12, 4. 12, 5. 1, 6. 28, 7. N/A (duplicate), 8. 12, 9. 4, 10. 2
Total Glyphs- 128
The analysis was conducted based on the 128 provided glyphs, after removing duplicate pictures. Out of 128 separate glyphs, no glyph appeared more than once, in exact form.
RED-
The symbol closely resembling a lowercase cursive letter "E" was seen frequently throughout, and in relatively the same location on the glyphs.
Out of 128, the symbol appeared at minimum - 57 times. And with broken uncertain symbols resembling this symbol, the number comes closer to 65, but for certainties sake, the minimum is used for confirmation.
(To reduce repetitiveness, the former concepts apply to all latter color codes, as stated in the "Red" description.)
PURPLE-
The symbol is an "X" or "+", similar to the letter "x", a cross, or plus symbol. Out of 128 glyphs, this symbol occurs at minimum- 48 times. Probable total being around 54.
BLUE-
The symbol(s) are 2 lines running parallel to each other, resembling an "=" sign. This covers the base of any 2 parallel lines that show up in the glyphs, regardless of their direction. (Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal)
This symbol(s) occurs at minimum- 75 times. Probable total being around 85.
GREEN-
The symbol is a random placed "Stroke" that has various degrees of "scribbles". These resemble the letter "s", (forward facing and backwards), the letter "z", the number "3" and the number "8".
These marks are a byproduct of unintelligible hand motions written at a rising rate of speed when viewed in order of left to right, up to down, like the English language. With quickening speed, these marks occur more randomly, get larger, and become more incoherent over time. (Sloppier)
To understand the context of this better;
If you've ever had detention in school, odds are you had to write a statement over and over again, x amount of times. Like you see in 'The Simpsons' theme song with Bart.
As your hand tires, or your speed increases, you'll notice the words getting sloppier and more jumbled up as you go down the page.
That same concept is seen throughout everyone of these consecutive "glyphs" written on the chalkboard.
***The difference however, (emphasis-a very, very, vital difference), between this mans chalkboard glyphs and an English written paper, is the dramatic scribbling effect associated with the glyphs.
This means that while your English detention assignment does get sloppier as you go on, the words are still fairly legible.
The same cannot be said with the glyphs.
A way to put this into perspective-
It's as if you started off writing in English, and by the time you got to the bottom of your first page, the letters are so mixed and jumbled that your English appears to have turned into Arabic.
You would not be able to read the bottom half of that page even if you had exceptional training in reading prescriptions written by doctors. It would not appear to be English at all.
That is what these scribbles signify and it can be clearly seen by looking at the chalkboard pictures and comparing the first row with the last.
There are far more potential strokes than pointed out here in green, but that is because two more categories focus on other potential patterns, or angles and curves.
Thus, highlighted here, this symbol(s) occurs at minimum- 37 times. Though probability is over 100.
YELLOW-
These symbols are particular angles show up in key areas of the glyphs. In relation to Kanji (Japanese written language), these angles would have significance much like the opposite of Kanji's radicals.
This is because these angles are the most diverse parts of the glyphs, which implies their purpose is more for details sake.
For example;
You have a horse, zebra, mule, and a donkey.
The classification for this is Equine. That would be similar to the base of Kanji characters' radicals. (Explained bellow)
So having that "base" similarity, the opposite of the radical would show more precise information, giving details that would specify the word or phrase.
So these angles appear in the areas where the details would be placed, because the incredibly high amount of repetitive strokes is laid out in particular areas of the glyphs.
Product of elimination so to speak, it's the only way these would even make sense, given the lack of diversity throughout.
This symbol (angle) appears at minimum- 110times. Of various directions, degrees, size, shape, but of relative locations.
ORANGE-
Similar to "ANGLES", this symbol focuses on the presumably detailed area of the glyph. They consist of curved lines, circles, half circles, and other non-angular strokes. This symbol (curves) occurs at minimum- 108 times.
.....
Here I lay out the amount of times the most frequent symbols occur throughout the 128 glyphs. The percentage is the amount of times that symbol occurs.
Red- 57/128 - 44.5%
Purple- 48/128 - 37.5%
Blue- 75/128 - 58.5%
Green- 37/128 - 28.9%
Yellow- 110/128 - 97.6%
Orange- 108/128 - 84.3%
.....
For comparison-
Kanji (Japanese written language)
Kanji has approx 2,000 characters that are primarily used. It also has about 5,000 characters to those well educated.
Kanji has over 200 "radicals", (or sub symbols that are used as a foundation character mark, and/or for the purpose of categorizing.
Kanji, the character for "grip" or "handle" have the same radical, which looks like a backwards lowercase "t" with 3 vertical likes rather than one.
However, beyond the radical (base) symbol, the characters themselves vary greatly.
This concept occurs in almost every hieroglyphic language, and serves as the base of the glyphs themselves.
***********************************************
...
DETAILS-
Now if you've noticed, I have categorized many of these in a broad manner like referring to 2 parallel lines, but not dividing those further by direction or placement.
That is because there is no concept of language and no purpose of further analysis. Though I have actually gone further, I found it's pointless to continue as the concept is very well spelt out and by now can be seen with the naked eye.
If you desire further analysis, you can jot down the branches of these general concepts for yourself and you will quickly see why it's unnecessary.
...
SUMMARY-
For analytical purposes, symbols have been counted and compared, and the above table has given the amount of minimal times these symbols occur throughout the 128 glyphs, and the percentage of those occurrences.
For laymans sake;
this is better explained with examples of comparison.
(In other words, the numbers and percentages above are there as factual evidence that is without bias or opinion. Now here will be the comparisons to better understand what this means, which is more for the sake of comprehension rather than politically correct data).
You have 26 letters in the English language. If we broke that up into categories for each letter, we would assess how many times a certain letter appeared in X amount of words.
So for the sake of comparison, let's take 128 words, and choose a letter that is frequent throughout. Letter "e", the most common letter in the English language.
Using a website to randomly generate 128 English words, (randomlists.com)-
(words provided at bottom)
Out of 128 words, how many words contain the letter "E" at least once?
69 times. I counted twice, though I may still have missed one but I know there was at least 69 words with the letter "e".
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
Why is this relevant? Because it helps give an understanding of why I came to the conclusion I did.
E- 69/128 - 53.9%
That means that the most common letter in the English language showed up in just over half of these words. In reality, the most common letter in English, "e" appears in about 13% of English words.
So with this list, its appearance is exceptionally greater.
Which is great because it gives a great comparison for "random" words, and that reflects the "unknown" randomness of the glyphs themselves, since we nor he chose specific words or glyphs. They are random.
Think about that for a moment, 53%.
Now look back to the table of color coded percentages.
What do we have?
Red- 57/128 - 44.5%
Purple- 48/128 - 37.5%
Blue- 75/128 - 58.5%
Green- 37/128 - 28.9%
Yellow- 110/128 - 97.6%
Orange- 108/128 - 84.3%
Catch it yet?
Out of 6 symbols on the glyphs, the top 4 symbols being specific strokes, what does that show?
Focusing on the more specific symbols, this shows that 4 symbols occur in this "mysterious language of glyphs", more frequently than
Though it does seem a bit ridiculous to analyze these "glyphs", it is the only proper way to determine factual evidence, and claim it as such. Mere thoughts and opinions have little purpose when it comes to determining knowledge above the level of hypothetical chit chat.
In other words, it has no value, no factual support without an actual analysis, and so I present my findings with facts and logical reason.
The photo's and compilation of the material will be at the bottom in full, and with thumbnails when relevant.
***TO SKIP ANALYTICAL SPECIFICS, MOVE AHEAD TO "DETAILS" & "SUMMARY"***
***TO SKIP EXAMPLES, MOVE FURTHER DOWN TO "CONCLUSION"***
From left going down 1-5, then right going down 6-10 (amount of photos)
(Amount of glyphs per photo)- 1. 23, 2. 34, 3. 12, 4. 12, 5. 1, 6. 28, 7. N/A (duplicate), 8. 12, 9. 4, 10. 2
Total Glyphs- 128
The analysis was conducted based on the 128 provided glyphs, after removing duplicate pictures. Out of 128 separate glyphs, no glyph appeared more than once, in exact form.
RED-
The symbol closely resembling a lowercase cursive letter "E" was seen frequently throughout, and in relatively the same location on the glyphs.
Out of 128, the symbol appeared at minimum - 57 times. And with broken uncertain symbols resembling this symbol, the number comes closer to 65, but for certainties sake, the minimum is used for confirmation.
(To reduce repetitiveness, the former concepts apply to all latter color codes, as stated in the "Red" description.)
PURPLE-
The symbol is an "X" or "+", similar to the letter "x", a cross, or plus symbol. Out of 128 glyphs, this symbol occurs at minimum- 48 times. Probable total being around 54.
BLUE-
The symbol(s) are 2 lines running parallel to each other, resembling an "=" sign. This covers the base of any 2 parallel lines that show up in the glyphs, regardless of their direction. (Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal)
This symbol(s) occurs at minimum- 75 times. Probable total being around 85.
GREEN-
The symbol is a random placed "Stroke" that has various degrees of "scribbles". These resemble the letter "s", (forward facing and backwards), the letter "z", the number "3" and the number "8".
These marks are a byproduct of unintelligible hand motions written at a rising rate of speed when viewed in order of left to right, up to down, like the English language. With quickening speed, these marks occur more randomly, get larger, and become more incoherent over time. (Sloppier)
To understand the context of this better;
If you've ever had detention in school, odds are you had to write a statement over and over again, x amount of times. Like you see in 'The Simpsons' theme song with Bart.
As your hand tires, or your speed increases, you'll notice the words getting sloppier and more jumbled up as you go down the page.
That same concept is seen throughout everyone of these consecutive "glyphs" written on the chalkboard.
***The difference however, (emphasis-a very, very, vital difference), between this mans chalkboard glyphs and an English written paper, is the dramatic scribbling effect associated with the glyphs.
This means that while your English detention assignment does get sloppier as you go on, the words are still fairly legible.
The same cannot be said with the glyphs.
A way to put this into perspective-
It's as if you started off writing in English, and by the time you got to the bottom of your first page, the letters are so mixed and jumbled that your English appears to have turned into Arabic.
You would not be able to read the bottom half of that page even if you had exceptional training in reading prescriptions written by doctors. It would not appear to be English at all.
That is what these scribbles signify and it can be clearly seen by looking at the chalkboard pictures and comparing the first row with the last.
There are far more potential strokes than pointed out here in green, but that is because two more categories focus on other potential patterns, or angles and curves.
Thus, highlighted here, this symbol(s) occurs at minimum- 37 times. Though probability is over 100.
YELLOW-
These symbols are particular angles show up in key areas of the glyphs. In relation to Kanji (Japanese written language), these angles would have significance much like the opposite of Kanji's radicals.
This is because these angles are the most diverse parts of the glyphs, which implies their purpose is more for details sake.
For example;
You have a horse, zebra, mule, and a donkey.
The classification for this is Equine. That would be similar to the base of Kanji characters' radicals. (Explained bellow)
So having that "base" similarity, the opposite of the radical would show more precise information, giving details that would specify the word or phrase.
So these angles appear in the areas where the details would be placed, because the incredibly high amount of repetitive strokes is laid out in particular areas of the glyphs.
Product of elimination so to speak, it's the only way these would even make sense, given the lack of diversity throughout.
This symbol (angle) appears at minimum- 110times. Of various directions, degrees, size, shape, but of relative locations.
ORANGE-
Similar to "ANGLES", this symbol focuses on the presumably detailed area of the glyph. They consist of curved lines, circles, half circles, and other non-angular strokes. This symbol (curves) occurs at minimum- 108 times.
.....
Here I lay out the amount of times the most frequent symbols occur throughout the 128 glyphs. The percentage is the amount of times that symbol occurs.
Red- 57/128 - 44.5%
Purple- 48/128 - 37.5%
Blue- 75/128 - 58.5%
Green- 37/128 - 28.9%
Yellow- 110/128 - 97.6%
Orange- 108/128 - 84.3%
.....
For comparison-
Kanji (Japanese written language)
Kanji has approx 2,000 characters that are primarily used. It also has about 5,000 characters to those well educated.
Kanji has over 200 "radicals", (or sub symbols that are used as a foundation character mark, and/or for the purpose of categorizing.
Kanji, the character for "grip" or "handle" have the same radical, which looks like a backwards lowercase "t" with 3 vertical likes rather than one.
However, beyond the radical (base) symbol, the characters themselves vary greatly.
This concept occurs in almost every hieroglyphic language, and serves as the base of the glyphs themselves.
***********************************************
...
DETAILS-
Now if you've noticed, I have categorized many of these in a broad manner like referring to 2 parallel lines, but not dividing those further by direction or placement.
That is because there is no concept of language and no purpose of further analysis. Though I have actually gone further, I found it's pointless to continue as the concept is very well spelt out and by now can be seen with the naked eye.
If you desire further analysis, you can jot down the branches of these general concepts for yourself and you will quickly see why it's unnecessary.
...
SUMMARY-
For analytical purposes, symbols have been counted and compared, and the above table has given the amount of minimal times these symbols occur throughout the 128 glyphs, and the percentage of those occurrences.
For laymans sake;
this is better explained with examples of comparison.
(In other words, the numbers and percentages above are there as factual evidence that is without bias or opinion. Now here will be the comparisons to better understand what this means, which is more for the sake of comprehension rather than politically correct data).
You have 26 letters in the English language. If we broke that up into categories for each letter, we would assess how many times a certain letter appeared in X amount of words.
So for the sake of comparison, let's take 128 words, and choose a letter that is frequent throughout. Letter "e", the most common letter in the English language.
Using a website to randomly generate 128 English words, (randomlists.com)-
(words provided at bottom)
Out of 128 words, how many words contain the letter "E" at least once?
69 times. I counted twice, though I may still have missed one but I know there was at least 69 words with the letter "e".
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
Why is this relevant? Because it helps give an understanding of why I came to the conclusion I did.
E- 69/128 - 53.9%
That means that the most common letter in the English language showed up in just over half of these words. In reality, the most common letter in English, "e" appears in about 13% of English words.
So with this list, its appearance is exceptionally greater.
Which is great because it gives a great comparison for "random" words, and that reflects the "unknown" randomness of the glyphs themselves, since we nor he chose specific words or glyphs. They are random.
Think about that for a moment, 53%.
Now look back to the table of color coded percentages.
What do we have?
Red- 57/128 - 44.5%
Purple- 48/128 - 37.5%
Blue- 75/128 - 58.5%
Green- 37/128 - 28.9%
Yellow- 110/128 - 97.6%
Orange- 108/128 - 84.3%
Catch it yet?
Out of 6 symbols on the glyphs, the top 4 symbols being specific strokes, what does that show?
Focusing on the more specific symbols, this shows that 4 symbols occur in this "mysterious language of glyphs", more frequently than
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
This is the analysis of Dave Skye's supposed glyphs of an unknown, secret, or lost language. The claims are that these are written from his mind, and that they must mean something because this "gift" showed up suddenly. The request was made to figure out what these glyphs mean, and as a feature of a channel I follow on youtube, I came to this video (link at the bottom), and decided to explain what it is, due to the amount of illogical assumptions made.
Though it does seem a bit ridiculous to analyze these "glyphs", it is the only proper way to determine factual evidence, and claim it as such. Mere thoughts and opinions have little purpose when it comes to determining knowledge above the level of hypothetical chit chat.
In other words, it has no value, no factual support without an actual analysis, and so I present my findings with facts and logical reason.
The photo's and compilation of the material will be at the bottom in full, and with thumbnails when relevant.
***TO SKIP ANALYTICAL SPECIFICS, MOVE AHEAD TO "DETAILS" & "SUMMARY"***
***TO SKIP EXAMPLES, MOVE FURTHER DOWN TO "CONCLUSION"***
From left going down 1-5, then right going down 6-10 (amount of photos)
(Amount of glyphs per photo)- 1. 23, 2. 34, 3. 12, 4. 12, 5. 1, 6. 28, 7. N/A (duplicate), 8. 12, 9. 4, 10. 2
Total Glyphs- 128
The analysis was conducted based on the 128 provided glyphs, after removing duplicate pictures. Out of 128 separate glyphs, no glyph appeared more than once, in exact form.
RED-
The symbol closely resembling a lowercase cursive letter "E" was seen frequently throughout, and in relatively the same location on the glyphs.
Out of 128, the symbol appeared at minimum - 57 times. And with broken uncertain symbols resembling this symbol, the number comes closer to 65, but for certainties sake, the minimum is used for confirmation.
(To reduce repetitiveness, the former concepts apply to all latter color codes, as stated in the "Red" description.)
PURPLE-
The symbol is an "X" or "+", similar to the letter "x", a cross, or plus symbol. Out of 128 glyphs, this symbol occurs at minimum- 48 times. Probable total being around 54.
BLUE-
The symbol(s) are 2 lines running parallel to each other, resembling an "=" sign. This covers the base of any 2 parallel lines that show up in the glyphs, regardless of their direction. (Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal)
This symbol(s) occurs at minimum- 75 times. Probable total being around 85.
GREEN-
The symbol is a random placed "Stroke" that has various degrees of "scribbles". These resemble the letter "s", (forward facing and backwards), the letter "z", the number "3" and the number "8".
These marks are a byproduct of unintelligible hand motions written at a rising rate of speed when viewed in order of left to right, up to down, like the English language. With quickening speed, these marks occur more randomly, get larger, and become more incoherent over time. (Sloppier)
To understand the context of this better;
If you've ever had detention in school, odds are you had to write a statement over and over again, x amount of times. Like you see in 'The Simpsons' theme song with Bart.
As your hand tires, or your speed increases, you'll notice the words getting sloppier and more jumbled up as you go down the page.
That same concept is seen throughout everyone of these consecutive "glyphs" written on the chalkboard.
***The difference however, (emphasis-a very, very, vital difference), between this mans chalkboard glyphs and an English written paper, is the dramatic scribbling effect associated with the glyphs.
This means that while your English detention assignment does get sloppier as you go on, the words are still fairly legible.
The same cannot be said with the glyphs.
A way to put this into perspective-
It's as if you started off writing in English, and by the time you got to the bottom of your first page, the letters are so mixed and jumbled that your English appears to have turned into Arabic.
You would not be able to read the bottom half of that page even if you had exceptional training in reading prescriptions written by doctors. It would not appear to be English at all.
That is what these scribbles signify and it can be clearly seen by looking at the chalkboard pictures and comparing the first row with the last.
There are far more potential strokes than pointed out here in green, but that is because two more categories focus on other potential patterns, or angles and curves.
Thus, highlighted here, this symbol(s) occurs at minimum- 37 times. Though probability is over 100.
YELLOW-
These symbols are particular angles show up in key areas of the glyphs. In relation to Kanji (Japanese written language), these angles would have significance much like the opposite of Kanji's radicals.
This is because these angles are the most diverse parts of the glyphs, which implies their purpose is more for details sake.
For example;
You have a horse, zebra, mule, and a donkey.
The classification for this is Equine. That would be similar to the base of Kanji characters' radicals. (Explained bellow)
So having that "base" similarity, the opposite of the radical would show more precise information, giving details that would specify the word or phrase.
So these angles appear in the areas where the details would be placed, because the incredibly high amount of repetitive strokes is laid out in particular areas of the glyphs.
Product of elimination so to speak, it's the only way these would even make sense, given the lack of diversity throughout.
This symbol (angle) appears at minimum- 110times. Of various directions, degrees, size, shape, but of relative locations.
ORANGE-
Similar to "ANGLES", this symbol focuses on the presumably detailed area of the glyph. They consist of curved lines, circles, half circles, and other non-angular strokes. This symbol (curves) occurs at minimum- 108 times.
.....
Here I lay out the amount of times the most frequent symbols occur throughout the 128 glyphs. The percentage is the amount of times that symbol occurs.
Red- 57/128 - 44.5%
Purple- 48/128 - 37.5%
Blue- 75/128 - 58.5%
Green- 37/128 - 28.9%
Yellow- 110/128 - 97.6%
Orange- 108/128 - 84.3%
.....
For comparison-
Kanji (Japanese written language)
Kanji has approx 2,000 characters that are primarily used. It also has about 5,000 characters to those well educated.
Kanji has over 200 "radicals", (or sub symbols that are used as a foundation character mark, and/or for the purpose of categorizing.
Kanji, the character for "grip" or "handle" have the same radical, which looks like a backwards lowercase "t" with 3 vertical likes rather than one.
However, beyond the radical (base) symbol, the characters themselves vary greatly.
This concept occurs in almost every hieroglyphic language, and serves as the base of the glyphs themselves.
***********************************************
...
DETAILS-
Now if you've noticed, I have categorized many of these in a broad manner like referring to 2 parallel lines, but not dividing those further by direction or placement.
That is because there is no concept of language and no purpose of further analysis. Though I have actually gone further, I found it's pointless to continue as the concept is very well spelt out and by now can be seen with the naked eye.
If you desire further analysis, you can jot down the branches of these general concepts for yourself and you will quickly see why it's unnecessary.
...
SUMMARY-
For analytical purposes, symbols have been counted and compared, and the above table has given the amount of minimal times these symbols occur throughout the 128 glyphs, and the percentage of those occurrences.
For laymans sake;
this is better explained with examples of comparison.
(In other words, the numbers and percentages above are there as factual evidence that is without bias or opinion. Now here will be the comparisons to better understand what this means, which is more for the sake of comprehension rather than politically correct data).
You have 26 letters in the English language. If we broke that up into categories for each letter, we would assess how many times a certain letter appeared in X amount of words.
So for the sake of comparison, let's take 128 words, and choose a letter that is frequent throughout. Letter "e", the most common letter in the English language.
Using a website to randomly generate 128 English words, (randomlists.com)-
(words provided at bottom)
Out of 128 words, how many words contain the letter "E" at least once?
69 times. I counted twice, though I may still have missed one but I know there was at least 69 words with the letter "e".
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
Why is this relevant? Because it helps give an understanding of why I came to the conclusion I did.
E- 69/128 - 53.9%
That means that the most common letter in the English language showed up in just over half of these words. In reality, the most common letter in English, "e" appears in about 13% of English words.
So with this list, its appearance is exceptionally greater.
Which is great because it gives a great comparison for "random" words, and that reflects the "unknown" randomness of the glyphs themselves, since we nor he chose specific words or glyphs. They are random.
Think about that for a moment, 53%.
Now look back to the table of color coded percentages.
What do we have?
Red- 57/128 - 44.5%
Purple- 48/128 - 37.5%
Blue- 75/128 - 58.5%
Green- 37/128 - 28.9%
Yellow- 110/128 - 97.6%
Orange- 108/128 - 84.3%
Catch it yet?
Out of 6 symbols on the glyphs, the top 4 symbols being specific strokes, what does that show?
Focusing on the more specific symbols, this shows that 4 symbols occur in this "mysterious language of glyphs", more frequently than the most common letter "e" does in the English language. At 13%, this means these 4 symbols show up 3 or more times than "e" does.
And it shows that at a rate of randomness, 4 symbols show up about the same amount of times as the letter "e".
So this glyph language would be like having 4 letters that all have the same frequency in use.
Well, the top 4 letters in English are "e", "t", "a" and "o".
E- 13%
T- 8.5%
A- 8%
O- 7.7%
The top 4 symbols of the glyphs-
Red- 44.5%
Purple- 37.5%
Blue- 58.5%
Green- 28.9%
That's not even counting crossing and overlapping.
So essentially, these glyphs are repeating the same 4 symbols at a frequency that defines their basic strokes. And that means that there are limited other symbols that do not fall into this frequency of pattern.
The glyphs would all be nearly the same word or phrase, and have a foundation of 4-6 general words or phrases in nearly all 128 glyphs. The exception of 2 I recall.
CONCLUSION
AGAIN, WHAT THE HELL DOES THIS MEAN?
It means, THIS GLYPH SHIT IS FUCKING BULLSHIT!
That's what it means.
Now that the statistical analysis is complete, I can be frank and explain how and why I got to this point.
The glyphs appear at first glance to be varying, giving it the appearance of uniqueness. This is due in part to the flipping of direction, and also to the fact that the sloppiness increases steadily.
It begins to be spelt out on how similar each glyph is to the other, when you start pointing at those similarities.
These glyphs have a consecutive pattern that is associated only by the fact that they are written at the same time.
There was very limited amounts of material to base this on, which of course seems to hinder any logic to be applied. The sheer lack of material is alarming in itself, because it limits any analysis to just a few pictures of the same chalk board of glyphs written at the same time.
Due to the information that this has been happening for years, since I was 6 years old actually, there should be tons of notebooks filled with these. Yet none are provided.
WHAT ARE THEY?
The strokes are a combination of muscle memory, and random chicken scratch. Which is why if other material written at least several months apart was provided, you would see 2 things; similar "BASE" strokes, like the 4 given in the above analysis, and THEN drastically different chicken scratch strokes.
This is because muscle memory is using the motions that his brain has associated with writing the most common letters. The cursive "e" stroke, the 2 parallel lines stroke, the zig zag S, Z, 3, 8 stroke, and the X or cross, + stroke.
With known numbers and letters, these strokes are the most common used in our English language and so you will see those motions the most. Much like a child who cannot yet spell correctly, but has learned to write some letters, and will toss those random strokes on a coloring page and its just gibberish.
You could do it to, and see how that muscle memory works for you. And if compared to other forms of writing, you will see those basic strokes differ. Rather than in English word form, where one stroke would appear one after the other as we write in English, he instead gathers those strokes in the form of hieroglyphs by stacking.
Try it, you'll be amazed how quickly you suddenly are writing this mysterious language too. Magic? Nope. Just muscle memory.
You also will notice how it gets sloppier over time. Which I explained above so won't again, but what you will notice is how the other "random" strokes become more and more dramatically different as you go on. That is because the brain is focusing less on the muscle memory strokes, and more on new "random" strokes. This switch of focus creates an overly excitable stroke pattern, which will only increase as the writing continues without pause.
(TRYING TO HARD, because he no longer has to focus on the automatic movements, which is why you see the same strokes in order)
I pointed out where the cursive "e" symbol appeared at first and by line 2, it was then switched to this zig zag S Z symbol 3 times in a row, before the photos edge.
This all gives the illusion of a variety of glyphs, but in truth, it's actually the same motions appearing in the same areas, but messier and more random each time.
And if you know anything about Kanji, there is actually a pattern the strokes have to be in. You do not just toss lines onto paper, you have to do those strokes in order. The purpose in kanji and other Chinese character texts is the same in English, but not nearly as enforced in English because the end result can still be the same even if somebody writes the lowercase letter "d" from the line to the circle, or the circle to the line.
But in kanji, glyphs, etc. the strokes change more, and alter the end result more and so attention to detail is more important.
If you watch this mans video, you will see no such attention to detail, and notice how each stroke matters less and less and becomes more sloppy with each new glyph.
What does that say?
It's simple;
It says independent strokes have no function.
If the strokes had purpose than they would remain legible throughout. The "breaking" of strokes that seems to leave more and more lines, dots, and zig zags without meaning further prove that there is no actual concept to base this off of.
He isn't writing glyphs that appear in his mind, he is writing strokes that his hands make. Otherwise, attention to detail would be applied.
And as an artist, I know that when I draw from a mental image, my hands are not going to be able to reproduce that image in a matter of seconds, and have it resemble the actual mental image with clarity.
SO....
Is this a marketing scheme or a delusion?
That is probably the only thing I cannot say with certainty.
The only person who knows that answer, is the man himself.
Either he wrote them to gain popularity, attention, and with knowledge of his bullshit, or he wrote them under a delusion to which he actually believes that this is real.
*********************************************************************************
Greedy and Desperate
-OR-
Delusional and Denial
That, my dear friend, is the only true mystery here.
⁃ Ash
FURTHER READING and REFERENCES-
The youtube video -
WORD LIST FOR EXAMPLE -
0. trail
0. dinner
0. judicious
0. measure
0. preserve
0. dad
0. whispering
0. fool
0. rose
0. applaud
0. belong
0. dangerous
0. liquid
0. flame
0. scale
0. count
0. yak
0. confess
0. alleged
0. mint
0. youthful
0. guarantee
0. cheese
0. truck
0. one
0. insurance
0. owe
0. sign
0. depend
0. oafish
0. print
0. rain
0. tender
0. invincible
0. boast
0. invite
0. trite
0. observant
0. business
0. curl
0. dramatic
0. short
0. woozy
0. exist
0. racial
0. heady
0. zealous
0. love
0. pack
0. squirrel
0. prepare
0. coast
0. different
0. run
0. kick
0. show
0. false
0. basket
0. notebook
0. crash
0. voiceless
0. thirsty
0. tax
0. like
0. pinch
0. fluttering
0. shock
0. hurry
0. friendly
0. gray
0. stereotyped
0. history
0. business
0. fearless
0. debt
0. unpack
0. null
0. plants
0. society
0. box
0. kiss
0. bashful
0. example
0. abhorrent
0. earthquake
0. cent
0. icicle
0. form
0. carriage
0. fabulous
0. finicky
0. advise
0. whisper
0. choke
0. limping
0. moan
0. domineering
0. needless
0. screw
0. obeisant
0. second-hand
0. battle
0. damaged
0. passenger
0. mean
0. ducks
0. abundant
0. childlike
0. current
0. minister
0. educated
0. friction
0. joyous
0. force
0. shaky
0. divide
0. present
0. crawl
0. decay
0. broad
0. mate
0. rightful
0. simplistic
0. risk
0. beneficial
0. panicky
0. wipe
0. shrug
Though it does seem a bit ridiculous to analyze these "glyphs", it is the only proper way to determine factual evidence, and claim it as such. Mere thoughts and opinions have little purpose when it comes to determining knowledge above the level of hypothetical chit chat.
In other words, it has no value, no factual support without an actual analysis, and so I present my findings with facts and logical reason.
The photo's and compilation of the material will be at the bottom in full, and with thumbnails when relevant.
***TO SKIP ANALYTICAL SPECIFICS, MOVE AHEAD TO "DETAILS" & "SUMMARY"***
***TO SKIP EXAMPLES, MOVE FURTHER DOWN TO "CONCLUSION"***
From left going down 1-5, then right going down 6-10 (amount of photos)
(Amount of glyphs per photo)- 1. 23, 2. 34, 3. 12, 4. 12, 5. 1, 6. 28, 7. N/A (duplicate), 8. 12, 9. 4, 10. 2
Total Glyphs- 128
The analysis was conducted based on the 128 provided glyphs, after removing duplicate pictures. Out of 128 separate glyphs, no glyph appeared more than once, in exact form.
RED-
The symbol closely resembling a lowercase cursive letter "E" was seen frequently throughout, and in relatively the same location on the glyphs.
Out of 128, the symbol appeared at minimum - 57 times. And with broken uncertain symbols resembling this symbol, the number comes closer to 65, but for certainties sake, the minimum is used for confirmation.
(To reduce repetitiveness, the former concepts apply to all latter color codes, as stated in the "Red" description.)
PURPLE-
The symbol is an "X" or "+", similar to the letter "x", a cross, or plus symbol. Out of 128 glyphs, this symbol occurs at minimum- 48 times. Probable total being around 54.
BLUE-
The symbol(s) are 2 lines running parallel to each other, resembling an "=" sign. This covers the base of any 2 parallel lines that show up in the glyphs, regardless of their direction. (Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal)
This symbol(s) occurs at minimum- 75 times. Probable total being around 85.
GREEN-
The symbol is a random placed "Stroke" that has various degrees of "scribbles". These resemble the letter "s", (forward facing and backwards), the letter "z", the number "3" and the number "8".
These marks are a byproduct of unintelligible hand motions written at a rising rate of speed when viewed in order of left to right, up to down, like the English language. With quickening speed, these marks occur more randomly, get larger, and become more incoherent over time. (Sloppier)
To understand the context of this better;
If you've ever had detention in school, odds are you had to write a statement over and over again, x amount of times. Like you see in 'The Simpsons' theme song with Bart.
As your hand tires, or your speed increases, you'll notice the words getting sloppier and more jumbled up as you go down the page.
That same concept is seen throughout everyone of these consecutive "glyphs" written on the chalkboard.
***The difference however, (emphasis-a very, very, vital difference), between this mans chalkboard glyphs and an English written paper, is the dramatic scribbling effect associated with the glyphs.
This means that while your English detention assignment does get sloppier as you go on, the words are still fairly legible.
The same cannot be said with the glyphs.
A way to put this into perspective-
It's as if you started off writing in English, and by the time you got to the bottom of your first page, the letters are so mixed and jumbled that your English appears to have turned into Arabic.
You would not be able to read the bottom half of that page even if you had exceptional training in reading prescriptions written by doctors. It would not appear to be English at all.
That is what these scribbles signify and it can be clearly seen by looking at the chalkboard pictures and comparing the first row with the last.
There are far more potential strokes than pointed out here in green, but that is because two more categories focus on other potential patterns, or angles and curves.
Thus, highlighted here, this symbol(s) occurs at minimum- 37 times. Though probability is over 100.
YELLOW-
These symbols are particular angles show up in key areas of the glyphs. In relation to Kanji (Japanese written language), these angles would have significance much like the opposite of Kanji's radicals.
This is because these angles are the most diverse parts of the glyphs, which implies their purpose is more for details sake.
For example;
You have a horse, zebra, mule, and a donkey.
The classification for this is Equine. That would be similar to the base of Kanji characters' radicals. (Explained bellow)
So having that "base" similarity, the opposite of the radical would show more precise information, giving details that would specify the word or phrase.
So these angles appear in the areas where the details would be placed, because the incredibly high amount of repetitive strokes is laid out in particular areas of the glyphs.
Product of elimination so to speak, it's the only way these would even make sense, given the lack of diversity throughout.
This symbol (angle) appears at minimum- 110times. Of various directions, degrees, size, shape, but of relative locations.
ORANGE-
Similar to "ANGLES", this symbol focuses on the presumably detailed area of the glyph. They consist of curved lines, circles, half circles, and other non-angular strokes. This symbol (curves) occurs at minimum- 108 times.
.....
Here I lay out the amount of times the most frequent symbols occur throughout the 128 glyphs. The percentage is the amount of times that symbol occurs.
Red- 57/128 - 44.5%
Purple- 48/128 - 37.5%
Blue- 75/128 - 58.5%
Green- 37/128 - 28.9%
Yellow- 110/128 - 97.6%
Orange- 108/128 - 84.3%
.....
For comparison-
Kanji (Japanese written language)
Kanji has approx 2,000 characters that are primarily used. It also has about 5,000 characters to those well educated.
Kanji has over 200 "radicals", (or sub symbols that are used as a foundation character mark, and/or for the purpose of categorizing.
Kanji, the character for "grip" or "handle" have the same radical, which looks like a backwards lowercase "t" with 3 vertical likes rather than one.
However, beyond the radical (base) symbol, the characters themselves vary greatly.
This concept occurs in almost every hieroglyphic language, and serves as the base of the glyphs themselves.
***********************************************
...
DETAILS-
Now if you've noticed, I have categorized many of these in a broad manner like referring to 2 parallel lines, but not dividing those further by direction or placement.
That is because there is no concept of language and no purpose of further analysis. Though I have actually gone further, I found it's pointless to continue as the concept is very well spelt out and by now can be seen with the naked eye.
If you desire further analysis, you can jot down the branches of these general concepts for yourself and you will quickly see why it's unnecessary.
...
SUMMARY-
For analytical purposes, symbols have been counted and compared, and the above table has given the amount of minimal times these symbols occur throughout the 128 glyphs, and the percentage of those occurrences.
For laymans sake;
this is better explained with examples of comparison.
(In other words, the numbers and percentages above are there as factual evidence that is without bias or opinion. Now here will be the comparisons to better understand what this means, which is more for the sake of comprehension rather than politically correct data).
You have 26 letters in the English language. If we broke that up into categories for each letter, we would assess how many times a certain letter appeared in X amount of words.
So for the sake of comparison, let's take 128 words, and choose a letter that is frequent throughout. Letter "e", the most common letter in the English language.
Using a website to randomly generate 128 English words, (randomlists.com)-
(words provided at bottom)
Out of 128 words, how many words contain the letter "E" at least once?
69 times. I counted twice, though I may still have missed one but I know there was at least 69 words with the letter "e".
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
Why is this relevant? Because it helps give an understanding of why I came to the conclusion I did.
E- 69/128 - 53.9%
That means that the most common letter in the English language showed up in just over half of these words. In reality, the most common letter in English, "e" appears in about 13% of English words.
So with this list, its appearance is exceptionally greater.
Which is great because it gives a great comparison for "random" words, and that reflects the "unknown" randomness of the glyphs themselves, since we nor he chose specific words or glyphs. They are random.
Think about that for a moment, 53%.
Now look back to the table of color coded percentages.
What do we have?
Red- 57/128 - 44.5%
Purple- 48/128 - 37.5%
Blue- 75/128 - 58.5%
Green- 37/128 - 28.9%
Yellow- 110/128 - 97.6%
Orange- 108/128 - 84.3%
Catch it yet?
Out of 6 symbols on the glyphs, the top 4 symbols being specific strokes, what does that show?
Focusing on the more specific symbols, this shows that 4 symbols occur in this "mysterious language of glyphs", more frequently than the most common letter "e" does in the English language. At 13%, this means these 4 symbols show up 3 or more times than "e" does.
And it shows that at a rate of randomness, 4 symbols show up about the same amount of times as the letter "e".
So this glyph language would be like having 4 letters that all have the same frequency in use.
Well, the top 4 letters in English are "e", "t", "a" and "o".
E- 13%
T- 8.5%
A- 8%
O- 7.7%
The top 4 symbols of the glyphs-
Red- 44.5%
Purple- 37.5%
Blue- 58.5%
Green- 28.9%
That's not even counting crossing and overlapping.
So essentially, these glyphs are repeating the same 4 symbols at a frequency that defines their basic strokes. And that means that there are limited other symbols that do not fall into this frequency of pattern.
The glyphs would all be nearly the same word or phrase, and have a foundation of 4-6 general words or phrases in nearly all 128 glyphs. The exception of 2 I recall.
CONCLUSION
AGAIN, WHAT THE HELL DOES THIS MEAN?
It means, THIS GLYPH SHIT IS FUCKING BULLSHIT!
That's what it means.
Now that the statistical analysis is complete, I can be frank and explain how and why I got to this point.
The glyphs appear at first glance to be varying, giving it the appearance of uniqueness. This is due in part to the flipping of direction, and also to the fact that the sloppiness increases steadily.
It begins to be spelt out on how similar each glyph is to the other, when you start pointing at those similarities.
These glyphs have a consecutive pattern that is associated only by the fact that they are written at the same time.
There was very limited amounts of material to base this on, which of course seems to hinder any logic to be applied. The sheer lack of material is alarming in itself, because it limits any analysis to just a few pictures of the same chalk board of glyphs written at the same time.
Due to the information that this has been happening for years, since I was 6 years old actually, there should be tons of notebooks filled with these. Yet none are provided.
WHAT ARE THEY?
The strokes are a combination of muscle memory, and random chicken scratch. Which is why if other material written at least several months apart was provided, you would see 2 things; similar "BASE" strokes, like the 4 given in the above analysis, and THEN drastically different chicken scratch strokes.
This is because muscle memory is using the motions that his brain has associated with writing the most common letters. The cursive "e" stroke, the 2 parallel lines stroke, the zig zag S, Z, 3, 8 stroke, and the X or cross, + stroke.
With known numbers and letters, these strokes are the most common used in our English language and so you will see those motions the most. Much like a child who cannot yet spell correctly, but has learned to write some letters, and will toss those random strokes on a coloring page and its just gibberish.
You could do it to, and see how that muscle memory works for you. And if compared to other forms of writing, you will see those basic strokes differ. Rather than in English word form, where one stroke would appear one after the other as we write in English, he instead gathers those strokes in the form of hieroglyphs by stacking.
Try it, you'll be amazed how quickly you suddenly are writing this mysterious language too. Magic? Nope. Just muscle memory.
You also will notice how it gets sloppier over time. Which I explained above so won't again, but what you will notice is how the other "random" strokes become more and more dramatically different as you go on. That is because the brain is focusing less on the muscle memory strokes, and more on new "random" strokes. This switch of focus creates an overly excitable stroke pattern, which will only increase as the writing continues without pause.
(TRYING TO HARD, because he no longer has to focus on the automatic movements, which is why you see the same strokes in order)
I pointed out where the cursive "e" symbol appeared at first and by line 2, it was then switched to this zig zag S Z symbol 3 times in a row, before the photos edge.
This all gives the illusion of a variety of glyphs, but in truth, it's actually the same motions appearing in the same areas, but messier and more random each time.
And if you know anything about Kanji, there is actually a pattern the strokes have to be in. You do not just toss lines onto paper, you have to do those strokes in order. The purpose in kanji and other Chinese character texts is the same in English, but not nearly as enforced in English because the end result can still be the same even if somebody writes the lowercase letter "d" from the line to the circle, or the circle to the line.
But in kanji, glyphs, etc. the strokes change more, and alter the end result more and so attention to detail is more important.
If you watch this mans video, you will see no such attention to detail, and notice how each stroke matters less and less and becomes more sloppy with each new glyph.
What does that say?
It's simple;
It says independent strokes have no function.
If the strokes had purpose than they would remain legible throughout. The "breaking" of strokes that seems to leave more and more lines, dots, and zig zags without meaning further prove that there is no actual concept to base this off of.
He isn't writing glyphs that appear in his mind, he is writing strokes that his hands make. Otherwise, attention to detail would be applied.
And as an artist, I know that when I draw from a mental image, my hands are not going to be able to reproduce that image in a matter of seconds, and have it resemble the actual mental image with clarity.
SO....
Is this a marketing scheme or a delusion?
That is probably the only thing I cannot say with certainty.
The only person who knows that answer, is the man himself.
Either he wrote them to gain popularity, attention, and with knowledge of his bullshit, or he wrote them under a delusion to which he actually believes that this is real.
*********************************************************************************
Greedy and Desperate
-OR-
Delusional and Denial
That, my dear friend, is the only true mystery here.
⁃ Ash
FURTHER READING and REFERENCES-
The youtube video -
WORD LIST FOR EXAMPLE -
0. trail
0. dinner
0. judicious
0. measure
0. preserve
0. dad
0. whispering
0. fool
0. rose
0. applaud
0. belong
0. dangerous
0. liquid
0. flame
0. scale
0. count
0. yak
0. confess
0. alleged
0. mint
0. youthful
0. guarantee
0. cheese
0. truck
0. one
0. insurance
0. owe
0. sign
0. depend
0. oafish
0. print
0. rain
0. tender
0. invincible
0. boast
0. invite
0. trite
0. observant
0. business
0. curl
0. dramatic
0. short
0. woozy
0. exist
0. racial
0. heady
0. zealous
0. love
0. pack
0. squirrel
0. prepare
0. coast
0. different
0. run
0. kick
0. show
0. false
0. basket
0. notebook
0. crash
0. voiceless
0. thirsty
0. tax
0. like
0. pinch
0. fluttering
0. shock
0. hurry
0. friendly
0. gray
0. stereotyped
0. history
0. business
0. fearless
0. debt
0. unpack
0. null
0. plants
0. society
0. box
0. kiss
0. bashful
0. example
0. abhorrent
0. earthquake
0. cent
0. icicle
0. form
0. carriage
0. fabulous
0. finicky
0. advise
0. whisper
0. choke
0. limping
0. moan
0. domineering
0. needless
0. screw
0. obeisant
0. second-hand
0. battle
0. damaged
0. passenger
0. mean
0. ducks
0. abundant
0. childlike
0. current
0. minister
0. educated
0. friction
0. joyous
0. force
0. shaky
0. divide
0. present
0. crawl
0. decay
0. broad
0. mate
0. rightful
0. simplistic
0. risk
0. beneficial
0. panicky
0. wipe
0. shrug
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In